Seedance 2.5 vs Kling 3.0
Seedance 2.5 and Kling 3.0 are two of the most popular new-generation video models, and both generate sound together with the picture. Here's how they differ on Sibrik — length, references, formats and price — and which one to pick for your task.
| Seedance 2.5 | Kling 3.0 | |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | ByteDance | Kuaishou |
| Clip length | 4–30 s (auto duration available) | 3–15 s |
| Aspect ratios | 1:1, 4:3, 3:4, 16:9, 9:16, 21:9, adaptive | 16:9, 9:16, 1:1 |
| Sound | Yes | Yes |
| Inputs | Text, image; up to 30 images + 10 videos + 10 audio files as references | Text or a start image |
| Video editing | Yes — Seedance 2.5 Edit | No (use Kling O1 for editing) |
| Price on Sibrik | 5.6 credits per second | 8 credits per second |
| 10-second clip | 56 credits | 80 credits |
Choose Seedance 2.5 if
- you need clips longer than 15 seconds
- you want to guide the video with many references — characters, motion clips, music
- you need to edit an existing video
- price per second matters
Choose Kling 3.0 if
- you want a short cinematic clip from one prompt or one image
- you already have prompts tuned for Kling
- you're making 3–15 second clips in 16:9, 9:16 or 1:1
Not sure? Run the same prompt in both models — on Sibrik one balance covers all of them.
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Seedance 2.5 or Kling 3.0?
On Sibrik, Seedance 2.5 costs 5.6 credits per second and Kling 3.0 costs 8 credits per second, so a 10-second clip is 56 vs 80 credits.
Which makes longer videos?
Seedance 2.5: up to 30 seconds per generation, versus 15 seconds for Kling 3.0.
Do both models generate sound?
Yes, both generate audio together with the video.
Can I use both with one account?
Yes. Sibrik gives you both — and 40+ other models — with one credit balance.